Simfile General Information | ||
---|---|---|
Type | Pad | No Banner Found |
BPM | 136-140 | |
Last Activity | 17 years ago (2008-06-30 01:17am) | |
Last Updated By | CoreyBlaze |
Simfile File Download | |
---|---|
No Files |
Simfile Progress Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
Single Beginner | None | Double Beginner | None |
Single Basic | Done - Level 3 | Double Basic | None |
Single Difficult | Done - Level 6 | Double Difficult | None |
Single Expert | Done - Level 8 | Double Expert | None |
Single Challenge | None | Double Challenge | None |
Single Edit | None | Double Edit | None |
Audio Quality | Perfect (High Quality) | ||
Banner Quality | Perfect | ||
Background Quality | Perfect |
Other Information | |
---|---|
Comments | Please read the included READ ME. |
Views | 1,651 |
Downloads | 368 |
Rating | 9★ (Based on 2 ratings) |
Rate Simfile |
Comments

JessTehSkox
~STEPS~
S-Light: I don't really care for the long series of jumps, and the rest of the steps seem terribly uninspired. 12/20.
S-Standard: Same complaint about the jumps here (double-steps are really only interesting when mixed in with other steps, not used exclusively), though some decent parts in the rest of the chart take the score up a bit. 15/20.
S-Heavy: The sheer awesomeness of most of this chart makes my complaint about the excessive jumps pretty much irrelevent here. Good job. 18/20.
~MISCELLANY~
Song Quality: Can't complain. 20/20.
Extras: Graphics suit the song quite well, lrc. file was a nice addition, and the readme is amusing, at least! 20/20.
TOTAL: 85/100 (Rounding up to a not-perfect-but-as-close-as-you-can-get-without-actually-getting-a-perfect-score 9/10!)
16.9 years ago · Comment #2
S-Light: I don't really care for the long series of jumps, and the rest of the steps seem terribly uninspired. 12/20.
S-Standard: Same complaint about the jumps here (double-steps are really only interesting when mixed in with other steps, not used exclusively), though some decent parts in the rest of the chart take the score up a bit. 15/20.
S-Heavy: The sheer awesomeness of most of this chart makes my complaint about the excessive jumps pretty much irrelevent here. Good job. 18/20.
~MISCELLANY~
Song Quality: Can't complain. 20/20.
Extras: Graphics suit the song quite well, lrc. file was a nice addition, and the readme is amusing, at least! 20/20.
TOTAL: 85/100 (Rounding up to a not-perfect-but-as-close-as-you-can-get-without-actually-getting-a-perfect-score 9/10!)
16.9 years ago · Comment #2
roy2009xedit
Steps:
Light: Not quite as ideal. I would have done a few things differently, especially the jumps. 1.4/2
Standard: Wait, did I write these steps? XD Anyway, 1.7/2
Heavy: Same idea as Standard. 1.7/2
Total: 4.8/6
Other:
Song Quality: Perfect. 2/2
Extras: .lrc file is good, graphics are good, and I have to say the readme was rather entertaining.
Total: 4/4
SUBTOTAL: 8.8/10
Rounds off to 9.
16.9 years ago · Comment #1
Light: Not quite as ideal. I would have done a few things differently, especially the jumps. 1.4/2
Standard: Wait, did I write these steps? XD Anyway, 1.7/2
Heavy: Same idea as Standard. 1.7/2
Total: 4.8/6
Other:
Song Quality: Perfect. 2/2
Extras: .lrc file is good, graphics are good, and I have to say the readme was rather entertaining.

Total: 4/4
SUBTOTAL: 8.8/10
Rounds off to 9.
16.9 years ago · Comment #1