| Simfile General Information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | Pad | No Banner Found |
| BPM | 88-176 | |
| Last Activity | 17 years ago (2008-06-28 10:19am) | |
| Last Updated By | Chaozplayerp | |
| Simfile File Download | |
|---|---|
| No Files |
| Simfile Progress Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Beginner | Done - Level 1 | Double Beginner | None |
| Single Basic | Done - Level 3 | Double Basic | None |
| Single Difficult | Done - Level 5 | Double Difficult | None |
| Single Expert | Done - Level 9 | Double Expert | None |
| Single Challenge | Done - Level 12 | Double Challenge | None |
| Single Edit | None | Double Edit | None |
| Audio Quality | Perfect (High Quality) | ||
| Banner Quality | Custom Made | ||
| Background Quality | Custom Made | ||
| Other Information | |
|---|---|
| Comments | The bpm is 88-176 & the difficulties are 1/3/5/9/12. In the extras folder is a 418x164 banner & an alternate .sm file that contains rolls, hands, & mines. Read the readme for more information |
| Views | 1,506 |
| Downloads | 442 |
| Rating | 7.3★ (Based on 3 ratings) |
| Rate Simfile | |
Comments
JessTehSkox
~STEPS~
S-Beginner: Another horribly simple ITG-Novice-esque chart that doesn't follow the music. 6/12.
S-Light: This almost would've worked better for the Beginner chart! 6/12.
S-Standard: Yet another chart that seems a bit behind where it really should be. Too simple. 6/12.
S-Heavy: Okay-ish. 8/12.
S-Challenge: The difficulty is obviously skewed; lack of balance really hurts this. 8/12.
~MISCELLANY~
Song Quality: Perfect, in terms of audio quality at least. 20/20.
Extras: Graphics get the job done, and the readme is, uh....at least it's there? 20/20.
TOTAL: 74/100 (Rounding down to a rather average rating of 7)
16.9 years ago · Comment #3
S-Beginner: Another horribly simple ITG-Novice-esque chart that doesn't follow the music. 6/12.
S-Light: This almost would've worked better for the Beginner chart! 6/12.
S-Standard: Yet another chart that seems a bit behind where it really should be. Too simple. 6/12.
S-Heavy: Okay-ish. 8/12.
S-Challenge: The difficulty is obviously skewed; lack of balance really hurts this. 8/12.
~MISCELLANY~
Song Quality: Perfect, in terms of audio quality at least. 20/20.
Extras: Graphics get the job done, and the readme is, uh....at least it's there? 20/20.
TOTAL: 74/100 (Rounding down to a rather average rating of 7)
16.9 years ago · Comment #3
roy2009xedit
Steps:
Beginner: Novice is a joke. Even Beginner should follow the music. .3/1.2
Light: Too easy for a Light chart, almost Beginner-like. .4/1.2
Standard: It's Standard, use more 8th notes. .4/1.2
Heavy: Similar problem to Challenge, but at least the beginning was toned down more. .8/1.2
Challenge: Follows the song well, but I didn't like how the difficulty was skewed towards the beginning instead of spread out. .7/1.2
Total: 2.6/6
Other:
Song Quality: Perfect. 2/2
Extras: Readme and background are good, but the banner in the Extras folder should have been the default. 1.8/2
Total: 3.8/4
SUBTOTAL: 6.4/10
Rounds off to a 6.
16.9 years ago · Comment #2
Beginner: Novice is a joke. Even Beginner should follow the music. .3/1.2
Light: Too easy for a Light chart, almost Beginner-like. .4/1.2
Standard: It's Standard, use more 8th notes. .4/1.2
Heavy: Similar problem to Challenge, but at least the beginning was toned down more. .8/1.2
Challenge: Follows the song well, but I didn't like how the difficulty was skewed towards the beginning instead of spread out. .7/1.2
Total: 2.6/6
Other:
Song Quality: Perfect. 2/2
Extras: Readme and background are good, but the banner in the Extras folder should have been the default. 1.8/2
Total: 3.8/4
SUBTOTAL: 6.4/10
Rounds off to a 6.
16.9 years ago · Comment #2
Oni-91
Wicked Plastic - JAKAZiD
----------------------------------
STEPS:
Single Beginner (out of 12): Serves its purpose well. 12/12.
Single Light (out of 12): Nothing wrong stepwise, but the song is too manic for the chart. You could have removed the 4th triplets and turned into a Beginner chart. 10/12.
Single Standard (out of 12): OK, the steps were good, but I thought that these really should have been the Light steps. It's a bit of a bummer that you didn't make the steps a 6 or 7, because the song is too manic for an easy Standard chart. 10/12.
Single Heavy (out of 12): One of the things that irked me a little was the use of tiny freezes. They don't really provide a purpose other than to clutter up the screen...anyway, the crossovers you put in made the steps a lot of fun, which is no mean feat considering the pattern repetition. 11.5/12.
Single Challenge (out of 12): That was a good workout! Got nothing against the challenging part, but the end part felt tacked on - it felt like a completely different chart. So, I'm gonna give it a 10/12.
SUBTOTAL: 53.5%
OTHERS:
Song Quality (out of 20): Can't fault you. 20/20.
Readme (out of 10): Description of each chart, song info, copyrights, nicely done. 10/10.
Extras (out of 10): Oh yes. Loving the GFX. My only gripe is that the title is too small on the background, so it gets a 9.5/10.
SUBTOTAL: 39.5%
TOTAL: 93%
17 years ago · Comment #1
----------------------------------
STEPS:
Single Beginner (out of 12): Serves its purpose well. 12/12.
Single Light (out of 12): Nothing wrong stepwise, but the song is too manic for the chart. You could have removed the 4th triplets and turned into a Beginner chart. 10/12.
Single Standard (out of 12): OK, the steps were good, but I thought that these really should have been the Light steps. It's a bit of a bummer that you didn't make the steps a 6 or 7, because the song is too manic for an easy Standard chart. 10/12.
Single Heavy (out of 12): One of the things that irked me a little was the use of tiny freezes. They don't really provide a purpose other than to clutter up the screen...anyway, the crossovers you put in made the steps a lot of fun, which is no mean feat considering the pattern repetition. 11.5/12.
Single Challenge (out of 12): That was a good workout! Got nothing against the challenging part, but the end part felt tacked on - it felt like a completely different chart. So, I'm gonna give it a 10/12.
SUBTOTAL: 53.5%
OTHERS:
Song Quality (out of 20): Can't fault you. 20/20.
Readme (out of 10): Description of each chart, song info, copyrights, nicely done. 10/10.
Extras (out of 10): Oh yes. Loving the GFX. My only gripe is that the title is too small on the background, so it gets a 9.5/10.
SUBTOTAL: 39.5%
TOTAL: 93%
17 years ago · Comment #1