| Simfile General Information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | Pad | No Banner Found |
| BPM | 86-172 | |
| Last Activity | 17 years ago (2008-06-25 04:49am) | |
| Last Updated By | DDRDAIKENKAI | |
| Simfile File Download | |
|---|---|
| No Files |
| Simfile Progress Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Beginner | None | Double Beginner | None |
| Single Basic | Done - Level 5 | Double Basic | None |
| Single Difficult | Done - Level 7 | Double Difficult | None |
| Single Expert | Done - Level 9 | Double Expert | None |
| Single Challenge | None | Double Challenge | None |
| Single Edit | None | Double Edit | None |
| Audio Quality | Perfect (High Quality) | ||
| Banner Quality | Perfect | ||
| Background Quality | Perfect | ||
| Other Information | |
|---|---|
| Comments | |
| Views | 2,079 |
| Downloads | 481 |
| Rating | 6.3★ (Based on 3 ratings) |
| Rate Simfile | |
Comments
JessTehSkox
~STEPS~
S-Light: Overly repetitive use of freezes and freeze jumps throughout most of the song, and streams on the slowdown that don't really mesh with the rest of the chart. 10/20.
S-Standard: Erm....isn't that first stream just a bit too long for a Standard chart? At least at this speed, I think. And what the heck is the chaos on the slowdown supposed to be following? 8/20.
S-Heavy: More competent than the other charts - I've noticed that your Heavy charts tend to be good, but it's as if you have no idea how to go about stepping the other difficulties. It's a bit too jumpy, and the random hands are kind of awkward, but other than that it's fine. 15/20.
~MISCELLANY~
Song Quality: My least favourite of the three songs you contributed, but the quality is just fine, at least. 20/20.
Extras: The graphics aren't exactly consistent....and no readme, either, which is odd. 8/20.
TOTAL: 61/100
16.9 years ago · Comment #2
S-Light: Overly repetitive use of freezes and freeze jumps throughout most of the song, and streams on the slowdown that don't really mesh with the rest of the chart. 10/20.
S-Standard: Erm....isn't that first stream just a bit too long for a Standard chart? At least at this speed, I think. And what the heck is the chaos on the slowdown supposed to be following? 8/20.
S-Heavy: More competent than the other charts - I've noticed that your Heavy charts tend to be good, but it's as if you have no idea how to go about stepping the other difficulties. It's a bit too jumpy, and the random hands are kind of awkward, but other than that it's fine. 15/20.
~MISCELLANY~
Song Quality: My least favourite of the three songs you contributed, but the quality is just fine, at least. 20/20.
Extras: The graphics aren't exactly consistent....and no readme, either, which is odd. 8/20.
TOTAL: 61/100
16.9 years ago · Comment #2
roy2009xedit
Steps:
Light: Very inconsistent in flow. Mostly half notes followed by eighths during the slowdown? .7/2
Standard: Also inconsistent in flow. Quarter notes followed by a long eighth stream, then a slowdown with steps that don't fit very well. .7/2
Heavy: Quite alright. 1.7/2
Total: 3.1/6
Others:
Song Quality: Perfect. 2/2
Extras: No readme and .old files were left in there. Graphics are okay, but the backgroud and banner should match more closely. .5/2
Total: 2.5/4
SUBTOTAL: 5.6/10
Rounds up to 6.
16.9 years ago · Comment #1
Light: Very inconsistent in flow. Mostly half notes followed by eighths during the slowdown? .7/2
Standard: Also inconsistent in flow. Quarter notes followed by a long eighth stream, then a slowdown with steps that don't fit very well. .7/2
Heavy: Quite alright. 1.7/2
Total: 3.1/6
Others:
Song Quality: Perfect. 2/2
Extras: No readme and .old files were left in there. Graphics are okay, but the backgroud and banner should match more closely. .5/2
Total: 2.5/4
SUBTOTAL: 5.6/10
Rounds up to 6.
16.9 years ago · Comment #1