| Simfile General Information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | Pad | No Banner Found |
| BPM | 135 | |
| Last Activity | 17.1 years ago (2008-06-02 04:40am) | |
| Last Updated By | roy2009xedit | |
| Simfile File Download | |
|---|---|
| RAR | RAR (0.97 MiB) 9.7 years ago |
| Simfile Progress Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Beginner | Done - Level 1 | Double Beginner | None |
| Single Basic | Done - Level 3 | Double Basic | Done - Level 2 |
| Single Difficult | Done - Level 5 | Double Difficult | Done - Level 5 |
| Single Expert | Done - Level 8 | Double Expert | Done - Level 8 |
| Single Challenge | Done - Level 10 | Double Challenge | Done - Level 9 |
| Single Edit | None | Double Edit | None |
| Audio Quality | Perfect (High Quality) | ||
| Banner Quality | Perfect | ||
| Background Quality | Perfect | ||
| Other Information | |
|---|---|
| Comments | The first of three entries in the BMSSCFZIVBWNOSLGTPSogmcc! Simfile Contest. |
| Views | 2,595 |
| Downloads | 807 |
| Rating | 9★ (Based on 1 rating) |
| Rate Simfile | |
Comments
JessTehSkox
~STEPS~
(Having nine difficulties present made this kinda tough, since 60 isn't evenly divisible by 9....the scores given are approximations of a more complicated system I had to use for this one.)
S-Beginner: Probably a bit much for Beginner, especially with all the jumps near the beginning. 5.2/6.7.
S-Light: Not bad at all, though it gets very repetitive in a few sports, even for Light. 5.7/6.7.
S-Standard: Now things are starting to get interesting! There's still a few minor flaws, but I can't complain too much. 6.1/6.7.
S-Heavy: Mostly solid, but there's some noticably awkward parts that definitely detract from the experience. 5.7/6.7.
S-Challenge: VERY fun. If it weren't for a few unnecessarily short freezes, I would've given this the full six points. As is, it still gets a perfectly acceptable 6.1/6.7.
D-Light: Just like the Light chart, repetitiveness is a problem....I suppose it's just a natural pitfall of using a song like this, though. 5.7/6.7.
D-Standard: Pretty good. 6.1/6.7.
D-Heavy: Somehow, I liked these better than the singles steps. 6.1/6.7.
D-Challenge: Same case here. They seem more solidly made than the S-Challenge steps, even despite their watered-down-ness. 6.4/6.7.
~MISCELLANY~
Song Quality: Seems just fine to me. Love the song, by the way. 20/20.
Extras: Graphics leave just a bit to be desired, and the readme is a bit sparse compared to some of the others; on the other hand, I very much appreciate the inclusion of a .lrc file. 16/20.
TOTAL: 89.1/100
16.9 years ago · Comment #1
(Having nine difficulties present made this kinda tough, since 60 isn't evenly divisible by 9....the scores given are approximations of a more complicated system I had to use for this one.)
S-Beginner: Probably a bit much for Beginner, especially with all the jumps near the beginning. 5.2/6.7.
S-Light: Not bad at all, though it gets very repetitive in a few sports, even for Light. 5.7/6.7.
S-Standard: Now things are starting to get interesting! There's still a few minor flaws, but I can't complain too much. 6.1/6.7.
S-Heavy: Mostly solid, but there's some noticably awkward parts that definitely detract from the experience. 5.7/6.7.
S-Challenge: VERY fun. If it weren't for a few unnecessarily short freezes, I would've given this the full six points. As is, it still gets a perfectly acceptable 6.1/6.7.
D-Light: Just like the Light chart, repetitiveness is a problem....I suppose it's just a natural pitfall of using a song like this, though. 5.7/6.7.
D-Standard: Pretty good. 6.1/6.7.
D-Heavy: Somehow, I liked these better than the singles steps. 6.1/6.7.
D-Challenge: Same case here. They seem more solidly made than the S-Challenge steps, even despite their watered-down-ness. 6.4/6.7.
~MISCELLANY~
Song Quality: Seems just fine to me. Love the song, by the way. 20/20.
Extras: Graphics leave just a bit to be desired, and the readme is a bit sparse compared to some of the others; on the other hand, I very much appreciate the inclusion of a .lrc file. 16/20.
TOTAL: 89.1/100
16.9 years ago · Comment #1