Z-I-v Summer Contest 2020

50: Super solid file with a retro charting feel. Careful not to face right too much!
51: Good, clean, easy fun. A little obvious copy-paste-mirror action but it doesn't worsen the chart any.
62: This feels like a good file on the cusp of becoming great, but you gave too little attention to the 16th rhythms (first half) or the patterning (second half). Nothing I outright didn't like though.
62: Reminds me of old ITG custom charts. It gets the point across well! It's a bit repetitive, but I also feel that's due in no small part to the song.
67: Really good, thoughtful incorporation of jumps into a solid chart. Probably should bump the rating up though, this is HARD for what it's at now
70: Cute use of shock arrows. I think the patterning needs a bit of work but, with as easy as the file is, it still works well enough.
71: Cheeky use of the attack! Super quiet, hard to hear what rhythms you were following…I think a lot of them may have been made up.
72: Cute and fun. Be careful how you leave LR or UD jumps - there were a couple places where the leading foot was ambiguous.
75: Technically sound, but a lot of the jumps felt "stapled on", added as an afterthought. Also be careful not to fall into karaoke stepping when it's not the most forward element…
77: If you're going to chart a BEMANI track I expect a lot more than steps to the leads. No free clout. If you wanna step the wobbles, at least be consistent. Not sure what's going on with your patterning, either - most of it faces right and there's a lot of doublesteps to force it into that. Drills are in vogue right now for official DDR but I need to see a lot less of them.
84: Extremely uncomfortable to play. It's very DDR-authentic, but I can't imagine queueing this up willingly, and it's way too much for the chillout song it's set to.
89: As the player, this chart kinda feels like you're just going through the motions for two minutes. I can't fault almost anything about the chart itself though, it just doesn't have much pizzazz. Cute use of the backward crossover unraveling thing to accent though
100: When the actual jump sections hit, they were cute, but I can't abide this quantity of karaoke stepping to a jungle track. It's a waste!
101: If you're going to chart a BEMANI track I expect a lot more than steps to the leads. No free clout. The jump placements don't complement the song, either?
176: Played it veeeeeery safe with the rhythms - I'm not sure this is to your benefit. Great foray into what I'm led to believe are brackets, but make sure you leave room for the player's foot to *release* as well! there are a lot of overlapping incidents.
179: I have no idea what you intended with this chart. The patterns don't make any sense and aren't consistent.
240: …this is SO GOOD. You need to bump the rating up by one or two but otherwise you've made your case for this theme flawlessly.
306: I had the distinct sensation I was playing a GuitarFreaks chart at first. The shock arrows are way too close to the jumps to not drift into them by accident on pad. Switches in and out of following the vocals at will. The BPM gimmicks are cool but not consistently applied and often disorienting. Crossovers are great, I love crossovers, but they happen so often and without much purpose. Lots of good ideas...no glue.
375: I'm sorry. I don't have anything nice to say about this one. I suppose it might fit in the DDR X days when they had just invented shock arrows and were sussing out how to use them.
477: You've got great taste in music! But please listen to it while you write the chart. A lot of wrong note placement, and unbelievably cumbersome patterning.