Post #21 · Posted at 2008-09-27 07:30:35am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Moderator+ |
7,262 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-07-19 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
"BBCode Not Allowed" |
I will not pay for crap like this. 

Post #22 · Posted at 2008-09-27 08:06:20am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
1,437 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-12-29 | |
"o_O?" |
Quote: n00b_saib0t
all they are doing is stopping people from running with the "hero" name, that's it. you're all being a bunch of immature internet dip shits because a company is stopping someone from using their idea(in this case, a name), similar to how konami had every right to stop another company from using their idea and everyone freaked out because roxor was too stupid to cover their asses legally.
try using logical thought before posting this kind of shit about how they are ripping something off. i know this is the internet, and logical thought is generally frowned upon, but really, try it some time. if it ever DOES come to pass, it will probably include a shit ton of features and game play elements that konami's dance game doesn't implement just like GH has tons of shit GF didn't implement.
try using logical thought before posting this kind of shit about how they are ripping something off. i know this is the internet, and logical thought is generally frowned upon, but really, try it some time. if it ever DOES come to pass, it will probably include a shit ton of features and game play elements that konami's dance game doesn't implement just like GH has tons of shit GF didn't implement.
I can't figure out whether to give you +5 or -5 for that comment.
I don't like getting rude awakenings, but I'm glad you gave that statement. Frankly, I didn't care whether or not Dance Hero was going to be full-fledged but you did happen put everything in perspective.
With a bunch of expletives.
So... +5. Too bad I +5'ed you a while back so I can't do anything about your current rating drop unfortunately.
I'm thinking that if this does get off the ground, Activision might hire Kyle Ward + group to make songs and we'll see an ITG revival under a different name. Sounds like a good thing.
Then again, Dance Hero might be just ITG-styled with "mainstream" songs and I can't tell if that's a good thing or not.

Post #23 · Posted at 2008-09-27 09:37:05am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member+ |
8,631 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-02-24 | |
![]() | |
"icon by hypnosispkmn@tumblr" |
Dance Hero.
=/
=/
Post #24 · Posted at 2008-09-27 09:49:36am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member+ |
6,172 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-03-25 | |
"On ZiV I'm like Princess Diana" |
Quote: FELMDemon
I'm thinking that if this does get off the ground, Activision might hire Kyle Ward + group to make songs and we'll see an ITG revival under a different name. Sounds like a good thing.
Then again, Dance Hero might be just ITG-styled with "mainstream" songs and I can't tell if that's a good thing or not.

Haha, keep dreaming. If GH is any indication, it'll be mostly be almost 100% licensed popular songs. And I would REALLY be surprised if Activision even consulted the dance game community regarding the game or hired anyone from the community for step making.
Honestly, with how much I dislike GH compared to GF/DM, and with how absolutely STUPID DJ Hero looks (The notes come circling on a record?...three keys? GH-like controls?) I have little to no hope for Dance Hero if it ever comes out.
Post #25 · Posted at 2008-09-27 10:34:18am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
10,356 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-04-06 | |
![]() ![]() |
Here's a new idea! It's called Finger Hero, where there's 16 square buttons that you tap to the beat to.
ripping off Jubeat/Ubeat

Post #26 · Posted at 2008-09-27 11:03:34am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member+ |
8,061 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-02-05 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
"Charlie isn't real" |
Quote: Pandemonium X
Here's a new idea! It's called Beat Hero, where there's 16 square buttons that you tap to the beat to.
ripping off Jubeat/Ubeat
fix'd
Post #27 · Posted at 2008-09-27 12:20:29pm 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Banned |
317 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-02-17 | |
I for one cant wait for pop'n hero
Post #28 · Posted at 2008-09-27 01:59:04pm 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
2,396 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-02-05 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
"F***ing exhausted." |
Quote: FELMDemon
Quote: n00b_saib0t
all they are doing is stopping people from running with the "hero" name, that's it. you're all being a bunch of immature internet dip shits because a company is stopping someone from using their idea(in this case, a name), similar to how konami had every right to stop another company from using their idea and everyone freaked out because roxor was too stupid to cover their asses legally.
try using logical thought before posting this kind of shit about how they are ripping something off. i know this is the internet, and logical thought is generally frowned upon, but really, try it some time. if it ever DOES come to pass, it will probably include a shit ton of features and game play elements that konami's dance game doesn't implement just like GH has tons of shit GF didn't implement.
try using logical thought before posting this kind of shit about how they are ripping something off. i know this is the internet, and logical thought is generally frowned upon, but really, try it some time. if it ever DOES come to pass, it will probably include a shit ton of features and game play elements that konami's dance game doesn't implement just like GH has tons of shit GF didn't implement.
I can't figure out whether to give you +5 or -5 for that comment.
I don't like getting rude awakenings, but I'm glad you gave that statement. Frankly, I didn't care whether or not Dance Hero was going to be full-fledged but you did happen put everything in perspective.
With a bunch of expletives.
So... +5. Too bad I +5'ed you a while back so I can't do anything about your current rating drop unfortunately.
I'm thinking that if this does get off the ground, Activision might hire Kyle Ward + group to make songs and we'll see an ITG revival under a different name. Sounds like a good thing.
Then again, Dance Hero might be just ITG-styled with "mainstream" songs and I can't tell if that's a good thing or not.

people need to get out of the mind-set that konami is god. two companies have proven that they can do two types of rhythm game better. guitar hero trumps guitar freaks in every way. ITG trumps DDR in everyway(except for music. but it runs on a much more solid engine, has better step charts, and is actually capable of being hard without being over done and sloppy). konami's games are still good, but when companies prove that they can do it better and people spit in the face of that company because konami did it first, its just dumb.
besides, i can live with the ratings drop. it doesnt effect me in any way that someone on the internet doesnt like that i called them out on being retarded. i've also always been the type to speak my mind. people can live with it, or eat a cock. it doesnt matter if its on the internet, at work(job security FTW here), the arcade, or wherever.
Post #29 · Posted at 2008-09-27 02:13:51pm 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member+ |
2,416 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-10-26 | |
![]() |
What I can't stand is when people dismiss others who don't share their opinion as "retarded". It is my opinion that DDR trumps ITG so Roxor didn't really prove anything to me but thats beside the point.
The way I see it, in the video game industry it's pretty scumbagish to take another company's concept of a video game, tweak it a tiny bit, then sell it as their own. It's like if an author were to take the book Moby Dick, change a few sentences here and there, and then sell the result as their own book and think they deserve all the money they make off of it because they think it's "better". In my opinion, no, companies like Roxor and Activision should not be praised because their genius ideas, and yes, Konami does deserve to be recognized because they did make it first. As far as music games go, Konami pretty came up with all the ideas so people tend to side with them.
The way I see it, in the video game industry it's pretty scumbagish to take another company's concept of a video game, tweak it a tiny bit, then sell it as their own. It's like if an author were to take the book Moby Dick, change a few sentences here and there, and then sell the result as their own book and think they deserve all the money they make off of it because they think it's "better". In my opinion, no, companies like Roxor and Activision should not be praised because their genius ideas, and yes, Konami does deserve to be recognized because they did make it first. As far as music games go, Konami pretty came up with all the ideas so people tend to side with them.
Post #30 · Posted at 2008-09-27 02:19:01pm 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
105 Posts | |
Not Set | |
Reg. 2008-02-06 | |
Well DDR is already mainstream, people wouldn't think its a ripoff
Post #31 · Posted at 2008-09-27 02:22:17pm 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
2,026 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2006-12-30 | |
"Gimme a mothaf----n' break!" |
Quote: Pretzelz
Well DDR is already mainstream, people wouldn't think its a ripoff
You never know. The world seems to grow dumber everyday, so there will probably be some stupids out there to think that.
Post #32 · Posted at 2008-09-27 02:40:42pm 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
2,235 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-08-03 | |
"りゅうきのん♪" |
Quote: kotaku.com
We'll bet you never saw this one coming.
BAKA LOLZ!!!!!

too creepy~
Quote: Pretzelz
Well DDR is already mainstream, people wouldn't think its a ripoff
What? Ripoff???





Post #33 · Posted at 2008-09-27 02:51:18pm 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
717 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-11-20 | |
"Stop being a fanboy, it sucks" |
I can't believe they did it...
Activison rips from Bemani too much..... but it's interesting to see how thing turns out later though...
Post #34 · Posted at 2008-09-27 03:03:21pm 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
7,364 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-05-14 | |
"Secret Agent" |
Oh, what a game. 

Post #35 · Posted at 2008-09-28 02:18:58am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
2,396 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-02-05 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
"F***ing exhausted." |
Quote: -Viper-
What I can't stand is when people dismiss others who don't share their opinion as "retarded". It is my opinion that DDR trumps ITG so Roxor didn't really prove anything to me but thats beside the point.
The way I see it, in the video game industry it's pretty scumbagish to take another company's concept of a video game, tweak it a tiny bit, then sell it as their own. It's like if an author were to take the book Moby Dick, change a few sentences here and there, and then sell the result as their own book and think they deserve all the money they make off of it because they think it's "better". In my opinion, yes, companies like Roxor and Activision should not be praised because their genius ideas, and Konami does deserve to be recognized because they did make it first. As far as music games go, Konami pretty came up with all the ideas so people tend to side with them.
The way I see it, in the video game industry it's pretty scumbagish to take another company's concept of a video game, tweak it a tiny bit, then sell it as their own. It's like if an author were to take the book Moby Dick, change a few sentences here and there, and then sell the result as their own book and think they deserve all the money they make off of it because they think it's "better". In my opinion, yes, companies like Roxor and Activision should not be praised because their genius ideas, and Konami does deserve to be recognized because they did make it first. As far as music games go, Konami pretty came up with all the ideas so people tend to side with them.
first of all, i'm stating facts about the situation. facts arent opinion because opinions cant be wrong. a fact is "we know nothing of this game, we cant possibly know its a rip off". most of them actually share my opinion about DDR being the better game and more fun to play, so i didnt say they are retarded because they disagree with my opinion, because they actually agree with it. i'm saying they're retarded because they are ignoring facts to bash a company that has copyrighted a new name.
ITG's engine is better than DDR's. this is a fact. you dont have to like everything about ITG, even i said that DDR has better music. ITG's step charts and engine are better than konami's. there is no shades of grey BS in ITG. there is no PRO BS in ITG. the easy songs are still put together in a way that you can enjoy them, and the hard charts are hard because they actually are, not because there are a ton of tempo changes and stops, with jumps placed everywhere they dont need to be. ITG supports real triplets, and while DDR is making them better, they still arent real triplets. ITG has more mods that people want, and keep requesting for DDR yet konami ignores the fans(like X2.5 and X4). konami's idea of new mods is a note skin that looks like a foot, and making mods they've had forever playable now. dont get me wrong, i would rather play DDR than ITG(music selection mostly), but ITG is a superior game when it comes to the engine and game development.
and your analogy with video games and books is invalid. it always seems like when i make points, people try and ignore them, so read my posts again. a much better analogy with books would be like sonic and mario. nintendo made a 2d side scroller and it went over good, so sega made one too. to compare that to books. person X writes a book about pirates and people like it, so person Y writes a book about pirates as well. konami made a dancing game and its a huge hit, andamiro and roxor followed suit and people like those games as well. now activision is making a game of their own, we dont even know if it will use the 4 cardinal directions like DDR, how the notes will scroll(we dont even know that they are arrows), what kinds of modifiers will be in the game, if it will feature music cuts or full songs, if there will be timing windows, what the controller will be like, etc. there are too many unknowns to say that they are ripping off konami by making a dance game. if making a dance game makes you a rip off, then the people that made britney's dance beat, despite making a completely original engine and way to play it, are rip offs as well.
you people may not like activision, but jumping out and calling them a rip off for doing nothing more than copyrighting a name is just dumb.
Post #36 · Posted at 2008-09-28 02:23:27am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member+ |
6,172 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-03-25 | |
"On ZiV I'm like Princess Diana" |
Can we have a thread that doesn't turn into ITG vs. DDR?
Post #37 · Posted at 2008-09-28 02:55:49am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Moderator+ |
13,518 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2006-10-20 | |
![]() ![]() | |
"Popular bisexual disaster" |
Quote: piepiepie75
Can we have a thread that doesn't turn into ITG vs. DDR?
It was asking for it, though.Post #38 · Posted at 2008-09-28 04:13:17am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member+ |
2,416 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-10-26 | |
![]() |
Quote: n00b_saib0t
and your analogy with video games and books is invalid. it always seems like when i make points, people try and ignore them, so read my posts again. a much better analogy with books would be like sonic and mario. nintendo made a 2d side scroller and it went over good, so sega made one too. to compare that to books. person X writes a book about pirates and people like it, so person Y writes a book about pirates as well. konami made a dancing game and its a huge hit, andamiro and roxor followed suit and people like those games as well. now activision is making a game of their own, we dont even know if it will use the 4 cardinal directions like DDR, how the notes will scroll(we dont even know that they are arrows), what kinds of modifiers will be in the game, if it will feature music cuts or full songs, if there will be timing windows, what the controller will be like, etc. there are too many unknowns to say that they are ripping off konami by making a dance game. if making a dance game makes you a rip off, then the people that made britney's dance beat, despite making a completely original engine and way to play it, are rip offs as well.
You make a good point, but a dancing game that uses arrows scolling into a step zone, BPM changes, freeze arrows, a songwheel interface, and speed mods is a bit more clearly defined as a certain game than a 2D side scroller. ITG and GH/Rock Band don't just belong to the same genre of the games they borrowed from like Mario/Sonic, they're direct copies, right down to the games gameplay and interface with minor additions, so I think my book analogy still stands. For example, they all took the idea of "hit the notes when they reach the zone" idea instead of coming up with a new one. ITG direct took the idea of freeze arrows and BPM changes and such, plus the songwheel interface is the exact same. Guitar Hero, though the graphics are better, has the same gameplay style and uses the "tilt the guitar" idea, though they did change the point in which you're supposed to do so. Rock Band simply takes GH/GF, Drummania, Karaoke Revolution, and puts them together. I'm saying these companies shouldn't expect to do this and expect to make money without getting involved in a lawsuit here and there.
Anyway, based on Guitar Hero and the DJ Hero controller, I don't think Activision deserves the benefit of the doubt that Dance Hero won't be a copy of DDR under a different name.
Post #39 · Posted at 2008-09-28 05:33:26am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
300 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2006-10-11 | |
Quote: Oni-91
Actually, Harmonix made FreQuency/Amplitude. They can be (sorta) excused from that.
And Phase, not to mention made the first Karaoke Revolution for Konami... Heck, Harmonix has proven about as original with their music games as Konami.
Post #40 · Posted at 2008-09-28 05:42:21am 16.7 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
3,205 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-02-20 | |
"I'm honestly pissed off." |
Quote: -Viper-
minor additions
Those additions may seem minor to you, but they are what makes ITG more playable than DDR. Thus, I play the one that was meant to be played without having to memorize every step in every chart to get a decent score.And I agree with n00b_saib0t. You're all overreacting way too much to this. Activision is simply protecting the status their actual Hero games have by making sure that nobody else can release a game called "Dance Hero" that makes the other hero games look bad. They probably have no intention of making such a game themselves. Calm down for a moment, and use some rational thought.
In fact, I agree with n00b_saib0t on every point of his. Konami made something that looks cool. Roxor made something similar that's playable. Konami does whatever they please, occasionally using suggestions from fans. Roxor put out an engine that allows people to put in whatever options, mods, noteskins, charts, themes they please, if they have the arcade owner's permission. Konami did something, and Roxor did it better, but they didn't cover their asses, so they got sued. Konami will continue to put out whatever crap they come up with, with no competing company to force them to actually make a better game. However much you may love Konami, you should face the reality that companies with no competition drop the quality of their product as soon as they think they can.
In my view, Konami is already starting to drop quality with the announcers they put in HP, X, and HP 2. If they were actually going for a high quality product, you'd be able to truly turn them off permanently, not just during the songs. I could go on and on listing things that show Konami isn't trying to make something as playable as ITG is.