Post #1 · Posted at 2009-05-11 04:22:05pm 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Admin |
9,402 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2006-05-01 | |
![]() | |
"BEMANI Sound Team" |

Yay or nay? So far it displays all difficulties and all information with avatar support.
F.C. = Full Combo
SDG = Single Digit Great
B.F. = Black Flag (1 Great)
The only major problem with it I guess is the really small font size; but please give feedback on it so I know what to put on or take off.
Post #2 · Posted at 2009-05-11 04:38:06pm 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
1,056 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-07-05 | |
i love it
I was waiting for it, and i didn't expect something sweet like this.
- Avatar support
- All those stats (all grades, alla difficulties)
This banner is sexy
The small font size is a problem and is not. I can read this. If you use a bigger font size, the banner will be too BIG.
And the fact that you used white font on a dark-blue background make the information easy to read (even the font is small).
So YAY !
Btw, even i will use this new banner. Maybe you should let the player choose beetween the new and the old banner or their profils.
Good Job Al.

- Avatar support
- All those stats (all grades, alla difficulties)
This banner is sexy

The small font size is a problem and is not. I can read this. If you use a bigger font size, the banner will be too BIG.
And the fact that you used white font on a dark-blue background make the information easy to read (even the font is small).
So YAY !
Btw, even i will use this new banner. Maybe you should let the player choose beetween the new and the old banner or their profils.
Good Job Al.
Post #3 · Posted at 2009-05-11 07:12:38pm 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
294 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-01-22 | |
"proud to be #2400" |
This looks great; would use it now if it weren't a prototype. 

Post #4 · Posted at 2009-05-11 07:36:47pm 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
3,644 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-05-29 | |
![]() | |
"^ featured on Law & Order" |
HELL YES!!! Support for all grades instead of 'A' and higher, and all difficulties.
The font size, coupled with white text on dark background, is perfect.
The font size, coupled with white text on dark background, is perfect.
Post #5 · Posted at 2009-05-11 08:27:47pm 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
3,205 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-02-20 | |
"I'm honestly pissed off." |
I think this looks good.
Post #6 · Posted at 2009-05-11 08:29:57pm 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
1,117 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-10-18 | |
![]() | |
"ARR JOO LEADY??" |
That's pretty neat-looking. Another alternative idea, is to graph the grades, according to approximated difficulties. The Y-axis could be the grade levels, where the X-axis is the difficulty ratings. That way, relative levels (IE:
vs
) wouldn't take up more room; and a level-9
would = a level-9
; and a level 10
!= a level 16
.
Or, you could just do two color-coded graphs, one for single play, and one for double play.
(EDIT: typo)







(EDIT: typo)
Post #7 · Posted at 2009-05-11 08:47:32pm 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Admin |
9,402 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2006-05-01 | |
![]() | |
"BEMANI Sound Team" |
Difficulty ratings would be impossible as the difficulties change from game to game.
Post #8 · Posted at 2009-05-11 09:01:00pm 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
290 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2009-02-05 | |
Not bad, but it's big (in pixel height), and would break some forum's sig guidelines.
Is this going to be in addition to the existing one, or a replacement?
Is this going to be in addition to the existing one, or a replacement?
Post #9 · Posted at 2009-05-11 09:06:30pm 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Admin |
9,402 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2006-05-01 | |
![]() | |
"BEMANI Sound Team" |
Addition most likely.
Post #10 · Posted at 2009-05-11 09:18:23pm 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member+ |
1,465 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-10-29 | |
![]() | |
"TAKING IT TO THE PIE" |
If you could decide what is actually displayed (what grades, difficulties, etc) this would be great, other wise ,that's way too much information I want to look at in a sig.
Post #11 · Posted at 2009-05-11 10:06:36pm 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
1,117 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-10-18 | |
![]() | |
"ARR JOO LEADY??" |
It shows you exactly how little you play
and
stages! 



Post #12 · Posted at 2009-05-12 12:18:25am 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member+ |
8,061 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-02-05 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
"Charlie isn't real" |
VERY NICE!
font is the only problem, but other than that this is really good
font is the only problem, but other than that this is really good

Post #13 · Posted at 2009-05-12 12:45:39am 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
5,221 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-02-10 | |
"jubeat knit one, purl two" |
I love the design.
The only thing that concerns me is the jump from 270x60 to 372x100. Some people will have to rearrange their signatures or even cut out things they don't want to. I would suggest a "preview" that's just some info and then linking to the rest.
The only thing that concerns me is the jump from 270x60 to 372x100. Some people will have to rearrange their signatures or even cut out things they don't want to. I would suggest a "preview" that's just some info and then linking to the rest.
Post #14 · Posted at 2009-05-12 12:48:52am 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Moderator+ |
13,518 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2006-10-20 | |
![]() ![]() | |
"Popular bisexual disaster" |
The only thing I'd omit in that design is the E grade. Not many people would publically display a failed song.
Post #15 · Posted at 2009-05-12 03:46:26am 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
3,205 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-02-20 | |
"I'm honestly pissed off." |
Since people are mentioning the height, I'd say, drop the avatar, and drop S-
S-
and D-
because nobody plays those for score. Dropping the E column is probably also good, because most people don't enter failing scores.



Post #16 · Posted at 2009-05-12 03:50:28am 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Admin |
9,402 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2006-05-01 | |
![]() | |
"BEMANI Sound Team" |
Only issue with that is if people WANT to show BEGINNER and stuff, I don't really want this to be biased towards people playing for score.
Post #17 · Posted at 2009-05-12 03:56:16am 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
3,205 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2008-02-20 | |
"I'm honestly pissed off." |
Quote: al2k4
I don't really want this to be biased towards people playing for score.
Wait, what? It's condensed score tracker info you put in your sig. If you put it in your sig, you are playing for score.Post #18 · Posted at 2009-05-12 03:57:37am 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Admin |
9,402 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2006-05-01 | |
![]() | |
"BEMANI Sound Team" |
Not really, you can't assume that. You might just be keeping track of what you can clear or not and just want to show what range of grades you get.
Post #19 · Posted at 2009-05-12 04:37:04am 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Moderator+ |
7,262 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2007-07-19 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
"BBCode Not Allowed" |
LOVE IT.
Now, I need to bring a camera to my arcade and start scoring.
Now, I need to bring a camera to my arcade and start scoring.

Post #20 · Posted at 2009-05-12 08:34:55am 16.1 years ago
![]() | |
---|---|
![]() |
Member |
290 Posts | |
![]() | |
Reg. 2009-02-05 | |
Quote: al2k4
You might just be keeping track of what you can clear or not and just want to show what range of grades you get.
Which is exactly what I use this tracker for (then again, to be fair I don't use a sig).