Register
Log In
Back To ForumsPost #1 · Posted at 2012-05-15 09:50:38am 1 year ago
 Nicolas | |
|---|---|
 |
 Member |
| 962 Posts | |
 | |
| Reg. 2009-10-25 | |
| 101.6pts | |
 ![Yahoo Instant Messenger: nicolasseven[at]yahoo.com](yahoo.png "Yahoo Instant Messenger: nicolasseven[at]yahoo.com")    | |
| "GRAAAAAAAAAAAAAWK" | |
Last updated: 2012-05-15 09:51am
I've always wanted my videos in StepMania to "stretch" through the whole screen when I'm converting an HD video (1280x720) to 640x480 or 480x320 and still keep its HD goodness.
The problem is it always ends up looking like this:
The problem is it always ends up looking like this:
Post #2 · Posted at 2012-05-15 12:30:50pm 1 year ago
| mageman17 | |
|---|---|
 |
 Member |
| 1,952 Posts | |
 | |
| Reg. 2008-06-15 | |
| 330.3pts | |
 | |
| "Anti RA 10175" | |
Stepmania 3.9 only supports 4:3 resolution. To get full HD support, use Stepmania 5.
The suggestedHD widescreen resolution for 640x480 is 854x480, btw. I dunno about 320p.
The suggested
Post #3 · Posted at 2012-05-15 12:38:16pm 1 year ago
| PanStyle | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 1,026 Posts | |
 | |
| Reg. 2007-07-05 | |
| 308.5pts | |
 | |
A lot of other build use better resolution, not only SM5. I mostly only plays on oitg and i can go high (with 4:3 and 16:19).
Post #4 · Posted at 2012-05-15 01:47:43pm 1 year ago
| Nicolas | |
|---|---|
|
Member |
| 962 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2009-10-25 | |
| 101.6pts | |
| |
| "GRAAAAAAAAAAAAAWK" | |
Quote: mageman17
Stepmania 3.9 only supports 4:3 resolution. To get full HD support, use Stepmania 5.
Does it use a lot of resources like SM 3.9?
Post #5 · Posted at 2012-05-15 01:53:50pm 1 year ago
| mageman17 | |
|---|---|
|
Member |
| 1,952 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2008-06-15 | |
| 330.3pts | |
| |
| "Anti RA 10175" | |
I can't say for sure. It seems to run more efficiently than 3.9, but that's just my observation. I wouldn't suggest using 1280x720 as the size for your videos, though.
Post #6 · Posted at 2012-05-15 02:12:34pm 1 year ago
| Nicolas | |
|---|---|
|
Member |
| 962 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2009-10-25 | |
| 101.6pts | |
| |
| "GRAAAAAAAAAAAAAWK" | |
Quote: mageman17
I wouldn't suggest using 1280x720 as the size for your videos, though.
Any frame size recommendations?For the meantime, I'll stick to 640x480
Post #7 · Posted at 2012-05-15 02:25:39pm 1 year ago
| mageman17 | |
|---|---|
|
Member |
| 1,952 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2008-06-15 | |
| 330.3pts | |
| |
| "Anti RA 10175" | |
I recommend 854x480 resolution.
Post #8 · Posted at 2012-05-15 02:44:36pm 1 year ago
| Nicolas | |
|---|---|
|
Member |
| 962 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2009-10-25 | |
| 101.6pts | |
| |
| "GRAAAAAAAAAAAAAWK" | |
Last updated: 2012-05-15 02:44pm
edit: never mind, thanks btw
Sorry kung makulit ako
Sorry kung makulit ako