Register
Log In
Back To ForumsPost #61 · Posted at 2011-06-28 09:45:40pm 1.9 years ago
 xRGTMx | |
|---|---|
 |
 Member+ |
| 4,686 Posts | |
 | |
| Reg. 2007-07-19 | |
| 369.3pts | |
            | |
| "some lady loves me" | |
*sigh* Another server load.
That's it. I'm done.
That's it. I'm done.
Post #62 · Posted at 2011-06-28 09:49:24pm 1.9 years ago
| TaroNuke | |
|---|---|
 |
 Member+ |
| 1,032 Posts | |
 | |
| Reg. 2009-02-04 | |
| 536.2pts | |
![Windows Live Messenger: taro4012[at]hotmail.co.uk](msn.png "Windows Live Messenger: taro4012[at]hotmail.co.uk")  | |
| "ya did good, kiddo" | |
Al2k4, you should organise a formal complaint.
Post #63 · Posted at 2011-06-28 09:50:15pm 1.9 years ago
| Aegis | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 7,745 Posts | |
 | |
| Reg. 2009-04-16 | |
| 341.4pts | |
| |
| "|| -You're all silly- ||" | |
More highloads in the past minutes than the amount of boomba's posts.
Post #64 · Posted at 2011-06-28 09:54:41pm 1.9 years ago
| Max | |
|---|---|
 |
 Member+ |
| 7,248 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2008-02-04 | |
| 682.9pts | |
   | |
| "j/k can u imagine?" | |
You know, i actually don't really see the flaw with the High Loads as opposed to about a year ago when dreamhost just said "fuck you ZIv, were going to completely 404 your ass and not let ANYONE get on to ZIv, thank you have a nice day :3"
Yeah i can see that the High Loads are a problem but i don't see it as something that's a NAGGING and a HUGE problem. Unless it really is screwing up ZIv, making it slower, causing breaks in the site, etc., i really do not see that big of a deal with the High Loads.
Granted, usually when they happen i am away from the computer doing something else or i AM on the computer doing something else...and when they occur, i just let it do it things and go back after about 2 minutes.
It WOULD be nice to get it fixed though, seeing that most everyone here is getting annoyed at the constant High Loads of the site, but as far as i can see it i don't have that much of a problem with it unless it completely blocks access to ZIv like it did last time.
Yeah i can see that the High Loads are a problem but i don't see it as something that's a NAGGING and a HUGE problem. Unless it really is screwing up ZIv, making it slower, causing breaks in the site, etc., i really do not see that big of a deal with the High Loads.
Granted, usually when they happen i am away from the computer doing something else or i AM on the computer doing something else...and when they occur, i just let it do it things and go back after about 2 minutes.
It WOULD be nice to get it fixed though, seeing that most everyone here is getting annoyed at the constant High Loads of the site, but as far as i can see it i don't have that much of a problem with it unless it completely blocks access to ZIv like it did last time.
Post #65 · Posted at 2011-06-28 10:20:58pm 1.9 years ago
| al2k4 | |
|---|---|
 |
 Admin  |
| 7,565 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2006-05-01 | |
| 1286.6pts | |
  | |
Made another change to the kill code, this better fix it ...
Post #66 · Posted at 2011-06-29 12:30:38am 1.9 years ago
| Mr.Music | |
|---|---|
 |
 Member |
| 1,564 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2010-08-28 | |
| 29.7pts | |
| |
| "I'm different" | |
Quote: al2k4
Made another change to the kill code, this better fix it ...
Unfortunately, it hasn't, and we're still getting high server loads. However, when we get it, the percentage is about 6% as opposed to the 22% it was a day or so ago. It also doesn't happen as often though it does happen.Post #67 · Posted at 2011-06-29 07:47:01am 1.9 years ago
| al2k4 | |
|---|---|
|
Admin |
| 7,565 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2006-05-01 | |
| 1286.6pts | |
| |
It's not even the server that's the issue, it's the stupid database that keeps locking up.
Post #68 · Posted at 2011-09-21 01:53:29pm 1.6 years ago
| Mr.Music | |
|---|---|
|
Member |
| 1,564 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2010-08-28 | |
| 29.7pts | |
| |
| "I'm different" | |
*bump* I keep getting 500 server errors whenever I try to do something on here and the chat is pretty much broken and not sending posts. It took me 5 minutes and at least 10 404's to get onto this page alone.
I even got a 500 trying to post this LOL
*bump* I keep getting 500 server errors and internal server errors whenever I try to do something on here and the chat is pretty much broken and not sending posts. It took me 5 minutes and at least 10 404's to get onto this page alone.
I even got a 500 and internal server error trying to post this LOL
I even got a 500 trying to post this LOL
*bump* I keep getting 500 server errors and internal server errors whenever I try to do something on here and the chat is pretty much broken and not sending posts. It took me 5 minutes and at least 10 404's to get onto this page alone.
I even got a 500 and internal server error trying to post this LOL
Post #69 · Posted at 2011-09-21 01:58:36pm 1.6 years ago
| al2k4 | |
|---|---|
|
Admin |
| 7,565 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2006-05-01 | |
| 1286.6pts | |
| |
Yeah can't help it, host issues.
Post #70 · Posted at 2011-09-21 02:43:04pm 1.6 years ago
| PanStyle | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 1,026 Posts | |
 | |
| Reg. 2007-07-05 | |
| 309pts | |
| |
I got a fatal error after sending a pm 5minutes ago. I had confirmation that the PM was sended but got a bunch of text (like when something failed in a php script) and one said fatal error blabla...
Post #71 · Posted at 2011-09-21 04:56:04pm 1.6 years ago
| al2k4 | |
|---|---|
|
Admin |
| 7,565 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2006-05-01 | |
| 1286.6pts | |
| |
Which user did you send a PM to? Most likely that user does not have a valid email address...
Post #72 · Posted at 2011-09-21 06:20:32pm 1.6 years ago
| PanStyle | |
|---|---|
|
Member |
| 1,026 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2007-07-05 | |
| 309pts | |
| |
It was Pandemonium X. It worked because he replyed to me.
I whould have take a screenshoot :/
I whould have take a screenshoot :/
Post #73 · Posted at 2011-09-21 06:23:16pm 1.6 years ago
| al2k4 | |
|---|---|
|
Admin |
| 7,565 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2006-05-01 | |
| 1286.6pts | |
| |
Yeah, Pandy doesn't have a valid e-mail address...
Post #74 · Posted at 2011-09-21 08:13:38pm 1.6 years ago
| iNEXSERTiON | |
|---|---|
 |
 Member+ |
| 2,072 Posts | |
| | |
| Reg. 2010-07-13 | |
| 170.2pts | |
| |
I got one randomly this morning when trying to go to a thread. I just went back and retried and it worked fine.
Post #75 · Posted at 2011-11-03 11:34:07pm 1.5 years ago
Server is intermittently up and down, but I'm sure you all knew that.
DH blamed me for it for high memory usage although this does not explain why pings fail outright, implying SERVER UNREACHABLE so I sent another e-mail back.
Will let you guys know what I hear...
So in the end, it turns out it wasn't my fault, as per usual!
Bump: Apologies for the downtime, database connections were kept open as our processes kept being killed off by the server, so the connections were not being closed. Due to that, the connection limit was reached, so DH just had to restart the database for it to clear.
DH blamed me for it for high memory usage although this does not explain why pings fail outright, implying SERVER UNREACHABLE so I sent another e-mail back.
Will let you guys know what I hear...
Quote
Hello Alan,
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, you wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> This does not explain why the entire server cannot be reached outside,
> even simple pings time out.
>
> I will look into the memory usage but I believe this is not causing the
> server to be unreachable!
>
> Please see ping logs:
>
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=448ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=43
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
>
> Ping statistics for 69.163.252.45:
> Packets: Sent = 1394, Received = 1096, Lost = 298 (21% loss),
>
> Thanks,
> Alan
>
I sincerely apologize for this issue. This issue seem to be caused another user that was using up resources on the server and our admin team has killed the process, which seems to have resolved the issue. If you are still seeing issues please let me know and I will check into this further.
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, you wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> This does not explain why the entire server cannot be reached outside,
> even simple pings time out.
>
> I will look into the memory usage but I believe this is not causing the
> server to be unreachable!
>
> Please see ping logs:
>
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=448ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=43
> Reply from 69.163.252.45: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=43
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
>
> Ping statistics for 69.163.252.45:
> Packets: Sent = 1394, Received = 1096, Lost = 298 (21% loss),
>
> Thanks,
> Alan
>
I sincerely apologize for this issue. This issue seem to be caused another user that was using up resources on the server and our admin team has killed the process, which seems to have resolved the issue. If you are still seeing issues please let me know and I will check into this further.
So in the end, it turns out it wasn't my fault, as per usual!
Bump: Apologies for the downtime, database connections were kept open as our processes kept being killed off by the server, so the connections were not being closed. Due to that, the connection limit was reached, so DH just had to restart the database for it to clear.
