Post #1 · Posté à 2009-02-24 11:05:05pm il y a 17.2 années
 3x0t1c m4n | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 3,371 Messages | |
 | |
| Reg. 2008-08-26 | |
| "i'm back " | |
Hi guys, could you give me some tips about choosing which OS I should use for my PC?
There's so much error in my XP SP2...
My plan is to rearrange my Desktop PC into a "new" one...
I want to install a New OS into my PC soon...
Which one do you think is better? Windows XP Service Pack 3 or Windows Vista 32 Bit Service Pack 1?
I want an OS that not too heavy to run and efficient...
thanks
There's so much error in my XP SP2...
My plan is to rearrange my Desktop PC into a "new" one...
I want to install a New OS into my PC soon...
Which one do you think is better? Windows XP Service Pack 3 or Windows Vista 32 Bit Service Pack 1?
I want an OS that not too heavy to run and efficient...
thanks
Post #2 · Posté à 2009-02-24 11:06:27pm il y a 17.2 années
| al2k4 | |
|---|---|
 |
Admin |
| 9,422 Messages | |
 | |
| Reg. 2006-05-01 | |
 | |
| "BEMANI Sound Team" | |
Not too resource demanding and efficient?
I'd go with Windows XP.
I'd go with Windows XP.
Post #3 · Posté à 2009-02-24 11:27:52pm il y a 17.2 années
| Arctic Wolves | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 2,586 Messages | |
 | |
| Reg. 2008-02-18 | |
I'd go for Windows XP SP3 as well. If you just want a lightweight OS, XP is definitely the slimmer of the two.
Post #4 · Posté à 2009-02-24 11:37:45pm il y a 17.2 années
| Mercury | |
|---|---|
 |
Member+ |
| 807 Messages | |
| | |
| Reg. 2007-06-15 | |
Windows XP all the way.
Vista may look nice but in comparison it's a bloated pile of crap.
Vista may look nice but in comparison it's a bloated pile of crap.
Post #5 · Posté à 2009-02-24 11:57:35pm il y a 17.2 années
| Exor | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 3,644 Messages | |
 | |
| Reg. 2008-05-29 | |
 | |
| "^ featured on Law & Order" | |
Windows XP. Vista is nice looking, and that's pretty much it.
Post #6 · Posté à 2009-02-25 12:11:25am il y a 17.2 années
| mageman17 | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 2,101 Messages | |
 | |
| Reg. 2008-06-15 | |
| "MAGGLE" | |
I'm going with XP, there are some applications that doesn't run well in Vista.
Post #7 · Posté à 2009-02-25 01:13:29am il y a 17.2 années
| sillybear | |
|---|---|
 |
Banned |
| 534 Messages | |
| Not Set | |
| Reg. 2008-08-19 | |
| "Thanks for all your support." | |
I choose XP SP3... cuz it's very stable OS
off-topics: According to source, Windows 7 is a faster/optimized OS version of Windows XP... is this true?
off-topics: According to source, Windows 7 is a faster/optimized OS version of Windows XP... is this true?
Post #8 · Posté à 2009-02-25 01:52:47am il y a 17.2 années
| Exor | |
|---|---|
|
Member |
| 3,644 Messages | |
| | |
| Reg. 2008-05-29 | |
| |
| "^ featured on Law & Order" | |
Quote: sillybear
off-topics: According to source, Windows 7 is a faster/optimized OS version of Windows XP... is this true?
See for yourself...Post #9 · Posté à 2009-02-25 05:02:24am il y a 17.2 années
| KKiONI | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 2,468 Messages | |
| | |
| Reg. 2007-12-06 | |
| "BEEJAY REVEL A" | |
Windows XP SP3
because with Vista:
-You get an update literally every week
-It's over protective with security (It won't let me, the administrator of the computer, add a plugin and other files to a certain directories while it allows websites to!)
-It get's glitchy sometimes
-It treats admins of the PC like a standard user (or at least it feels like it)
There is way more to be added to this list but to sum it up to save you time: Vista is a failure and Windows XP is more loose on security (but still safe enough)
because with Vista:
-You get an update literally every week
-It's over protective with security (It won't let me, the administrator of the computer, add a plugin and other files to a certain directories while it allows websites to!)
-It get's glitchy sometimes
-It treats admins of the PC like a standard user (or at least it feels like it)
There is way more to be added to this list but to sum it up to save you time: Vista is a failure and Windows XP is more loose on security (but still safe enough)
Post #10 · Posté à 2009-02-25 05:02:40am il y a 17.2 années
| PyroManiacX | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 3,731 Messages | |
| | |
| Reg. 2007-09-23 | |
| "Not dead yet!" | |
Wernt they gonna make a new Windows in 2010?
Anyways I go with XP
Anyways I go with XP
Post #11 · Posté à 2009-02-25 05:11:54am il y a 17.2 années
| musicfan32787 | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 742 Messages | |
| | |
| Reg. 2009-01-19 | |
| "Google Chrome = Win." | |
I thought Windows 7 was coming out relatively soon...
Yeah but anyways Vista sucks so much, so I'd go with XP if I had to choose between those two. I might want to try out Windows 7 first though to see if it's better.
Yeah but anyways Vista sucks so much, so I'd go with XP if I had to choose between those two. I might want to try out Windows 7 first though to see if it's better.
You just got pwned by the iPod.Post #12 · Posté à 2009-02-25 07:13:30pm il y a 17.2 années
| 3x0t1c m4n | |
|---|---|
|
Member |
| 3,371 Messages | |
| | |
| Reg. 2008-08-26 | |
| "i'm back " | |
Quote: KKiONI
Windows XP SP3
because with Vista:
-You get an update literally every week
There is way more to be added to this list but to sum it up to save you time: Vista is a failure and Windows XP is more loose on security (but still safe enough)
because with Vista:
-You get an update literally every week
There is way more to be added to this list but to sum it up to save you time: Vista is a failure and Windows XP is more loose on security (but still safe enough)
yeah, My Vista always wanted an Update everytime I open my notebook...
(OMG, I can't give it anymore space in my Harddisk... It's just too many of them
)WIndows Sidebar on Vista also reduce my system performance...
Post #13 · Posté à 2009-02-25 09:09:25pm il y a 17.2 années
| Exor | |
|---|---|
|
Member |
| 3,644 Messages | |
| | |
| Reg. 2008-05-29 | |
| |
| "^ featured on Law & Order" | |
Quote: 3x0t1c m4n
WIndows Sidebar on Vista also reduce my system performance...
You can actually have Sidebar not run at startup. In the start menu's search box, type 'Sidebar Properties', and click on it. Then uncheck the checkbox with the option to start Sidebar when Windows starts, and apply.Post #14 · Posté à 2009-02-26 12:12:43am il y a 17.2 années
| boomba | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 11,692 Messages | |
| Not Set | |
| Reg. 2008-01-19 | |
| "~ The evolution has begun ! ~" | |
I go for Xp.
VIsta seems to has bugs.
VIsta seems to has bugs.
Post #15 · Posté à 2009-02-26 02:08:02am il y a 17.2 années
| DDRmaster2007 | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 964 Messages | |
 | |
| Reg. 2006-12-08 | |
| "ASDFGFGBNFGV..." | |
I still prefer XP. I don't like Vista at tall
btw, I'll wait for this release.
Quote: Exor
Quote: sillybear
off-topics: According to source, Windows 7 is a faster/optimized OS version of Windows XP... is this true?
See for yourself...btw, I'll wait for this release.
Post #16 · Posté à 2009-03-09 12:18:03pm il y a 17.2 années
| KcLKcL | |
|---|---|
 |
Member |
| 388 Messages | |
| | |
| Reg. 2008-08-12 | |
 | |
Depends on your spec.
If you have Dual core processor that run at 2GHz+ speed, use vista.
Don't judge vista as "The most bloated windows ever"
Vista is stable, but if you hardware can't stand, you couldn't play a game on your PC (Like i was :p)
If your computer still Pentium 4 like me and you're planning to play games, use XP
If you have Dual core processor that run at 2GHz+ speed, use vista.
Don't judge vista as "The most bloated windows ever"
Vista is stable, but if you hardware can't stand, you couldn't play a game on your PC (Like i was :p)
If your computer still Pentium 4 like me and you're planning to play games, use XP
